#Qualitative social work journal how to#

Radikalisering og psykisk helse – En kunnskapsoppsummering (4 / 2016). Jessica Kingsley Publishers.įook, J., & Gardner, F. Lishman (Ed.), Handbook for Practice Learning in Social Work and Social Care, Third Edition (Third, pp. Reflective Practice and Critical Reflection. Emotional Exhaustion and turnover intention in human service occupations: The protective role of coworker support.

Journal for Deradicalization, 13, 101–136.ĭucharme, L. Radicalisation: The Last Taboo in Safeguarding and Child Protection? Assessing Practitioner Preparedness in Preventing the Radicalisation of Looked-After Children. Practitioner Research at Doctoral Level: Developing Coherent Research Methodologies (1st ed.). Risk to Researchers in Qualitative Research on Sensitive Topics: Issues and Strategies. Sensitive Interviewing in Qualitative Research: SENSITIVE INTERVIEWING.

ĭempsey, L., Dowling, M., Larkin, P., & Murphy, K. Family Medicine and Community Health, 7(2), e000057. Semistructured interviewing in primary care research: A balance of relationship and rigour. Studentlitteratur.ĭeJonckheere, M., & Vaughn, L. Reflective Lifeworld Research (2nd edtition). UK Department for Education.ĭahlberg, K., Dahlberg, H., & Nyström, M. Doctoral Supervision Practice: What’s the Problem and How Can We Help Academics? Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 5(1). Journal of Pediatric Health Care, 29(1), 108–112.Ĭarter, S., Kensington-Miller, B., & Courtney, M. Enabling Trust in Qualitative Research With Culturally Diverse Participants-ScienceDirect. Validity and reliability in qualitative research. Fergusson (Eds.), Understanding Research for Social Policy and Practice (pp. Now I see it, now I don’t: Researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. One Man’s Radical: The Radicalisation Debate and Australian Counterterrorism Policy. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 74(8), 1–7. Presenting and Evaluating Qualitative Research. In addition, asking specific questions raises concerns about the findings’ validity if probing and closed-ended questions are not balanced with open-ended ones.Īnderson, C. The responsibility for the lack of rich descriptions therefore belongs to the researcher, who must cast a critical eye on his or her own research practice. These findings share commonalities with sensitive client work and research targeting individuals at risk of radicalisation the researcher must be patient and thoughtful before he or she starts digging. ‘Warming them up’ and the ‘specificity of practitioner experience’ emerged as methodological themes from this reflective analytical process. Applying Fook and Gardner’s framework for critically reflective practice throughout the research process brought forth insights into researcher behaviour and sensitivity. This reflection started early in the data collection from the observation of participants being ‘onstage’ during interviews, appearing disconnected from their story. This paper draws on my experience from fieldwork throughout 2018, during which qualitative research was carried out through 17 in-depth interviews and two focus group interviews with experienced social workers involved in preventing radicalisation and violent extremism in Norway.

As many projects are directed at professionals involved in the efforts to prevent violent extremism, and some of these workers have been found to struggle with this issue, the question should also be raised of how to approach these individuals in research. This is necessary for establishing trust with and accessing the research project’s target group. Researching sensitive topics, such as individuals about whom concern for radicalisation and violent extremism has been raised, demands a thoroughly contemplated approach. Social Work, Qualitative Research, Violent Extremism, Critical Reflection Abstract

#Qualitative social work journal how to#